There is a potential problem in regard to the use of personal health records or PHRs online in that the companies that offer this service are not under any federal laws. There is a federal law called the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, which is referred to as HIPAA, but it does not apply to these companies. The law relates to information that is traded between health-care providers, health insurers and those clearinghouses that are involved in the processing of health care payments. Since the companies processing health care records and data are not included in this list, the law, according to Kevin Lyles, who serves as a partner in the health-care practice of law firm Jones Day's in Columbus, Ohio, does not apply. You deal with these companies on faith hoping that they won't do anything with your personal health information.
Protection for the Consumer
It seems that the legal system is still behind when it comes to how patients are employing health information. Lyles says that at the present time a congressional bill is pending in Congress directed are broadening the authority of HIPAA so that it will be able to cover all health information. He system that when all health information is available online, this is the direction that we will be taking. It will become necessary to protect that information that can be anywhere on the Net.
Google and Microsoft, which are providing a health records service online, will be working to allow those using the information to control the degree of access that they will allow various parties to have. This will include the ability to revoke that access at any time.
Georgetown University's Joy Pritt say that it is still however, necessary or the consumer to be aware of two important documents, the privacy policy and the terms of use. Lyles says that there needs to be clarity regarding ownership of the information being made public. He believes that it is the consumer who is required to make sure that the companies using their data are honest and straightforward because companies change their policies at any time. It is even doubtful that you will be aware of any sudden changes of policy that can affect your personal health data. Few companies send out privacy policies every year and most consumers anyway do you read them for changes.
SAN FRANCISCO There are a large number of well known companies today that are offering opportunities for individuals to help them to maintain control of their personal health-care information. They are also making it possible for people to make better use of this information.
For example, it was last fall that the giant software company Microsoft released a platform directed toward consumers, with regard to personal health records, which they called, HealthVault. The leading Internet search engine, Google is about to follow soon with the introduction of its version which it calls Google Health. These PHRs or personal health records are now being offered by close to 200 companies.
The health insurance company Aetna, announced earlier this month that it is adding a sophisticated search tool to its secure member Web site. This tool can find multiple resources, one example being relevant discount programs as well as a list of local doctors. This is all based on the search terms that the members enter. The company also announced that these changes will act as a complement to Aetna's new personal health records service for its members as well.
Those health consumers that are intent on collecting, storing, and being able to selectively share their health-care information digitally while greet these developments as being good news. It also will allow them to coordinate their health records with their doctors in addition to being able to enter medical questions into an intuitive online search engine.
But the main issue accompanying these changes is the question of personal privacy. Those health consumers who are entering personal and sensitive medical information into the PHR system are looking for assurance that these data will not be exposed in a manner that might be embarrassing to them or might possibly hurt their opportunity to secure a job or be included in a group health plan, or get health insurance at all. When it comes to protecting consumers' PHRs, legal experts are saying that even though many companies are promising confidentiality, and even though some states have laws that have established additional privacy standards, there are still many questions regarding this matter.
Nobody is really questioning the advantages of such a system of data gathering and retrieval, that can for instance alert consumers with regard to possible drug interactions on up to having the capacity to share X-rays and other diagnostic tests with doctors at different locations.
Lloyd’s of London is neither a company nor a corporation. It is basically a British insurance market. It serves as a meeting place where multiple financial backers or “members”, whether individuals, who are known as “Names” or corporations, come together to pool and spread risk. Their main business is in the reinsurance market.
Any reason is the right reason for taking out a health insurance policy. However if you are a member of some group – the Israel Philharmonic or the Alaska Diving Society – then it's worth looking into the option of taking out Group Health Insurance instead. Instead of what, you may be asking. Well instead of taking out individual health insurance. You see members of a group are entitled to Group Health Insurance regardless of the group they belong to.
Contact Us | Terms of Use | Trademarks | Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2009 Health Insurance Net . All Rights Reserved.